All involved rule revisited

[NickHolt]

It's good to get everyone's perspective on this.

 

That's what this forum is for.

 

Nick Holt

[kevin bowen]

Nick you may not believe it but some of us do like you a little. . by the way isnt it past your bed time ? .see ya tomorrow dude.

[NickHolt]

As many of you know, the Thunder Hill Raceway staff and I have been discussing modifications to the "all involved rule for several weeks.. actually, several months.

 

Over the past two weeks we have agreed on two important additions to the rule. One deals with cars that clearly spin to avoid an already existing incident yet wind up making contact with the cars that brought out the caution. The other involves the situation where a driver blatantly takes out another car. I quote the two additions to the rule that now covers these two situations:

 

3. If a car spins to miss the incident that brings out the yellow and is clearly not involved in any way in the incident that brings out the yellow, and, in the opinion of the Competition Director, clearly attempts to avoid the incident but makes contact with the cars that are involved anyway, that car may be reinstated at the discretion of the Competition Director.

 

4. There may be rare occasions when it is obvious to THR Officials that one car purposefully and deliberately rams or “takes out” another car during competition resulting in a caution period. In those rare instances when this is true, the “victim” may be reinstated at the discretion of the Competition Director

 

Nick Holt

[ProTree]

nick-check out the texas dwarf car assoc. rule book on line-go to race regulations-rule #6-it's like an all involved rule-