SASPEEDRACER24 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 I got through about the first half and got confused quickly... For you math folks this should be fun.... Click Here To Be Confused... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratdaddy Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nevermind.............................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVCMNGR1 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 That's not confusing! Any Six Sigma Black Belt could have told you that. Once you have Selected output characteristics, Defined performance standards, Validated measuring system, Established process capability, Defined performance objectives, Identify variation sources, Screened potential causes, Discovered variable relationships, Established operating tolerances, Re-Validated measuring system, Determine process capability and last but not least Implement process controls. Of course all of this is done using the DMAIC principle. You just plug the numbers into Minitab and let 'er rip. That is the easy part. It's the same thought process that goes into finding out why a jet liner slid off the runway. That is why it takes a year for some "genius" to figure out that there was ice or a "variable" that caused the accident. Welcome to my world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bigfat Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Duhhhhhhh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickHolt Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 You guys are making this way too complicated. First you simply reintermediate the dynamic systems and orchestrate enterprise channels. We all know how to do those things. Next you reprogram the enterprise infomediaries to morph the integrated platforms which obviously will harness the end-to-end vortals. Nothing could be simpler. Nick Holt P.S. If you are at all interested in knowing where I came up with this information, go to The Bullcorn Generator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProTree Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 yep svcmngr1,takes a year to figure out the thrust reversers failed,there was alot of ice,about 8 inches of snow,the plane started sliding when the pilot hammered the brakes when he realized he wasnt slowing down like normal and it wasnt going to stop till it hit something as"AJ" would say.But I'm waiting for an update from the gal who said it would be a long investigation for those famous words of why it's taking so long you always hear from every government agency,"our department is understaffed and underfunded and we're doing the best we can do with what we have"-BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truck99 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 And they say NASCAR racing is for rednecks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Come on guys. Its not that hard. I did the math and it looks like Carl Edwards will be the 2006 champion. Dale Jarrett will also break out of his slump and win 10 races in 06. Hey its all in the numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truck99 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Come on guys. Its not that hard. I did the math and it looks like Carl Edwards will be the 2006 champion. Dale Jarrett will also break out of his slump and win 10 races in 06. Hey its all in the numbers. Sweeeeet! Go 99! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SASPEEDRACER24 Posted December 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Jason the numbers arn't right all the time....I think you forgot to move a decimal point over in Jarretts case... :-P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tqj3 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 What about the "Random NASCAR Factor?" As in, when and how often will the NASCAR officials notice that old Pierre Debris has once again found his way onto the race track? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Budman Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 After the first 1 and 1/2 paragraphs, I skipped to the conclusion, which stated the study was inconclusive................................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAMS boy Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 After the first 1 and 1/2 paragraphs, I skipped to the conclusion, which stated the study was inconclusive................................ Now I get it!! Brad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Now I get it!! No you dont. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.