Danielsen Motorsports Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 First time to Kyle and it was alot of fun. 28 Late Models was more then worth the price of admission. Exicting racing in most of the mains. Pretty nice job all around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookie49 Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 ... 28 Late Models was more then worth the price of admission. Exicting racing in most of the mains. Pretty nice job all around. My only question is "Does TSRS have a quota of 1 yellow flag per car rule?" Seemed like there were 28 cautions too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danielsen Motorsports Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 That just made for more excitement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer61 Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 ... 28 Late Models was more then worth the price of admission. Exicting racing in most of the mains. Pretty nice job all around. My only question is "Does TSRS have a quota of 1 yellow flag per car rule?" Seemed like there were 28 cautions too. only 28...man, it felt like 58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookie49 Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 ... 28 Late Models was more then worth the price of admission. Exicting racing in most of the mains. Pretty nice job all around. My only question is "Does TSRS have a quota of 1 yellow flag per car rule?" Seemed like there were 28 cautions too. only 28...man, it felt like 58 Yeah felt that way sitting in the bleachers too. Coming down checker, I told my buddy,"go on to the can. There will be at least 5 more caution laps and another yellow. You won't miss the finish." I was right. It was a good race except for the cautions though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer61 Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 I had fun though. Hot!!! real hot!! We would go back green and just when the car started to cool down the yellow came out. The racing gods were toying with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrungot Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 How many cautions are just the right amount? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickHolt Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 How many cautions are just the right amount? 1.3, or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrungot Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 Now Nick.. is that the "caution ratio", or the "cars per caution ratio"... Correct me if i am wrong but if the magic caution ratio is that low then the cars per caution ratio has to be in the upper 20's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickHolt Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 Now Nick.. is that the "caution ratio", or the "cars per caution ratio"... Correct me if i am wrong but if the magic caution ratio is that low then the cars per caution ratio has to be in the upper 20's? Aaron, Aaron, Aaron. Come on, guy - you have to realize that we're talking hypnologic algorithm sets here, not some fuzzy "magic caution ratio." Look at it this way, if the indeterminate (read infinite, if you prefer) values of the hypotnii of the stylized, logarithmic (yet still undefined) right triangles that are defined by the nearly infinite array of radians which in turn are defined by the radii of the circles that define the mean of the turns of a typical race track are taken in to consideration, there obviously can be no magic caution ratio. I actually obtained the 1.3 caution periods per race event based on numerous studies by the Union of Racing Adjudicating Judges Enological Race Commission (URAJERC) an august body of former and current Hobby Stock drivers, who incorporate the data described above as well as data obtained from survey conducted on various racing forums, such as our own Texas Speed Zone (a URAJERC member site). Hope this clears that up once and for all. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jracer98 Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 "URAJERC" Jay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookie49 Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 ...Union of Racing Adjudicating Judges Enological Race Commission (URAJERC) ... such as our own Texas Speed Zone (a URAJERC member site). Hope this clears that up once and for all. Nick Hey, Hey No bashing now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcpyltx8 Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 Aaron, Aaron, Aaron. Come on, guy - you have to realize that we're talking hypnologic algorithm sets here, not some fuzzy "magic caution ratio." Look at it this way, if the indeterminate (read infinite, if you prefer) values of the hypotnii of the stylized, logarithmic (yet still undefined) right triangles that are defined by the nearly infinite array of radians which in turn are defined by the radii of the circles that define the mean of the turns of a typical race track are taken in to consideration, there obviously can be no magic caution ratio. I actually obtained the 1.3 caution periods per race event based on numerous studies by the Union of Racing Adjudicating Judges Enological Race Commission (URAJERC) an august body of former and current Hobby Stock drivers, who incorporate the data described above as well as data obtained from survey conducted on various racing forums, such as our own Texas Speed Zone (a URAJERC member site). Hope this clears that up once and for all. Nick So, umm nick, are you saying 2+2 is really 4 with your statement? -Shawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc200mph Posted October 4, 2007 Report Share Posted October 4, 2007 Aaron, Aaron, Aaron. Come on, guy - you have to realize that we're talking hypnologic algorithm sets here, not some fuzzy "magic caution ratio." Look at it this way, if the indeterminate (read infinite, if you prefer) values of the hypotnii of the stylized, logarithmic (yet still undefined) right triangles that are defined by the nearly infinite array of radians which in turn are defined by the radii of the circles that define the mean of the turns of a typical race track are taken in to consideration, there obviously can be no magic caution ratio. I actually obtained the 1.3 caution periods per race event based on numerous studies by the Union of Racing Adjudicating Judges Enological Race Commission (URAJERC) an august body of former and current Hobby Stock drivers, who incorporate the data described above as well as data obtained from survey conducted on various racing forums, such as our own Texas Speed Zone (a URAJERC member site). Hope this clears that up once and for all. Nick So, umm nick, are you saying 2+2 is really 4 with your statement? -Shawn Umm.. I dizzy now, ya'll quit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookie49 Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 Aaron, Aaron, Aaron. Come on, guy - you have to realize that we're talking hypnologic algorithm sets here, not some fuzzy "magic caution ratio." Look at it this way, if the indeterminate (read infinite, if you prefer) values of the hypotnii of the stylized, logarithmic (yet still undefined) right triangles that are defined by the nearly infinite array of radians which in turn are defined by the radii of the circles that define the mean of the turns of a typical race track are taken in to consideration, there obviously can be no magic caution ratio. I actually obtained the 1.3 caution periods per race event based on numerous studies by the Union of Racing Adjudicating Judges Enological Race Commission (URAJERC) an august body of former and current Hobby Stock drivers, who incorporate the data described above as well as data obtained from survey conducted on various racing forums, such as our own Texas Speed Zone (a URAJERC member site). Hope this clears that up once and for all. Nick So, umm nick, are you saying 2+2 is really 4 with your statement? -Shawn Nope, he's saying that (.5X4) +(.25 X8) = (10 x .4) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickHolt Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 Actually it's more like: The square root of 81 minus the square root of 25 equals the square root of 16. Who cares how we got there as long as we all get the same answser? Or, the inverse: As long as we all understand the concept and agree upon the methodology, who cares what the answer is? Nick P.S. I asked that same question in Physics 101 as a freshman at Bates College in 1962. Guess who got a D- that semester... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickHolt Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 The more I think about the number of "ideal" caution periods one should hope for in a stock car race, the more I think we need to unleash efficient channels and innovate intuitive partnerships as we strive to seize end-to-end synergies. Or to put that another way, our goal should be to streamline global partnerships and maximise dynamic methodologies, not forgetting that enhancing customised partnerships is always a good idea when integrating best-of-breed niches as in this case. Phew. I'm glad I got that off my chest. Been bugging me all day. Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookie49 Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 The more I think about the number of "ideal" caution periods one should hope for in a stock car race, the more I think we need to unleash efficient channels and innovate intuitive partnerships as we strive to seize end-to-end synergies. Or to put that another way, our goal should be to streamline global partnerships and maximise dynamic methodologies, not forgetting that enhancing customised partnerships is always a good idea when integrating best-of-breed niches as in this case. Phew. I'm glad I got that off my chest. Been bugging me all day. Nick Now that's the answer I've been waiting on. Debate closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-Crew Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 Darn! If he had said "paradigm" I would have had a blackout.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainbow Man Posted October 7, 2007 Report Share Posted October 7, 2007 Darn! If he had said "paradigm" I would have had a blackout.. Robert Glad you enjoyed THR and the show we will see ya a Randy's on the 26th Oct tell your son not to talk sooo much see ya rainbow Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakdad Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 I don't think I understand all I know about this............................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.