Pacecar Posted June 29, 2010 Report Share Posted June 29, 2010 Note that some tracks are revising the weight penalty for the McGunnegill vs. the Chevy / Ford Blue Oval. Instead of 50 lbs heavier for the McGunnegill, other tracks are going to a 25 lbs difference. http://www.speed51.com/2010_Stories/PLM/Gr...hange_6_28.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer61 Posted June 29, 2010 Report Share Posted June 29, 2010 Note that some tracks are revising the weight penalty for the McGunnegill vs. the Chevy / Ford Blue Oval. Instead of 50 lbs heavier for the McGunnegill, other tracks are going to a 25 lbs difference. http://www.speed51.com/2010_Stories/PLM/Gr...hange_6_28.html Do you know if anyone in HMP uses the McGunnegill engine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacecar Posted April 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 Well now there's new information that even the 25# penalty for the Ford McGunegill engine is unwarranted. http://www.speed51.com/2011_Stories/CRA/Cr...recap_4-26.html The 50# penalty imposed by HMP for the McGunegill likely caused those racers with that engine to feel that they had a competitive disadvantage. HMP does reserve the right to re-adjust their engine to weight formula..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacecar Posted April 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2011 Well now there's new information that even the 25# penalty for the Ford McGunegill engine is unwarranted. http://www.speed51.com/2011_Stories/CRA/Cr...recap_4-26.html The 50# penalty imposed by HMP for the McGunegill likely caused those racers with that engine to feel that they had a competitive disadvantage. HMP does reserve the right to re-adjust their engine to weight formula..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.