Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
toyotatim

2019 Nascar

Recommended Posts

Kurt Bush has a new ride and the new rules package should make things even more interesting for 2019.   The more fans talk about the excitement, the better chances are of getting sponsors attention.  That is what drives the sport.  The track at Marion could get a huge boost with the help of Nascars marketing power and local fans excitement about Nascar.  Lets get that 3/8+ miler build and shoot for a Speed 51 live broadcast of the Alamo 200 by year 3.   Get them Pro/Super Late Models ordered and lets get this party started

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The worst thing HMP , maybe Longhorn and the Marion track is to go NASCAR sanction. It hurt San Antonio Speedway more than it helped it. And that was when NASCAR was a bigger thing than it is now.Talk up NASCAR , announce about it or even show Saturday night NASCAR races on TV at the track  but DON'T  go sanction. If Texas grows to three asphalt tracks the best thing they can do is make it where the racers can race at all the tracks with few changes from their home tracks rules. Dirt racing has the luxury of IMCA rules being dominant.Maybe asphalt needs an rule package like that. Now is the time to do that since there is now only one but it could be three. I know it sounds good in theory and it is hard to do since each track has to take care of its own first. At the very least San Antonio and Austin should be the same.Just saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure the guys liked the $30,000 at the end of they year.   Did you see the attention at when it was Sanctioned?  Man, they had big sponsors, billboards, TV Commercials, Nascar even sent a film crew down to do one.  The money was flowing.  It makes landing sponsors easier.   Dont say it is necessary, look at the quality of cars at Five Flags.  But the most successful short track in Texas ever was Nascar Sanctioned.  That is just facts man, not opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"But the most successful short track in Texas ever was Nascar Sanctioned.  That is just facts man, not opinion. "

Then why did the asphalt tracks barely make 40 years open.  I can already think on track that has been open for over 50 years. Nascar sanction probably isnt the answer. Common rules strict tech and force passing will always help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, arob said:

What was the most successful asphalt NASCAR short track?

 

Bowman Gray longest weekly sanctioned track

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People go to Bowman Gray for races? If NASCAR was so great, why is SAS closed? Or Odessa in Missouri or Irwindale and IRP short track. Hell they even went dirt awhile. IRP thrived on USAC races as I remember Thursday Night Thunder fondly. I'm sure people involved with SAS will disagree with the "money was flowing" statement. 

Edited by top_shelf_12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being NASCAR sanctioned meant that the track:

- had the right to use the NASCAR name in all promotional endeavors. This was only valuable if the local manager knew enough about leveraging this asset to make it worth the hefty sanctioning fees imposed by NASCAR. I only know of one SAS promoter who actually used the sanction to generate money at the front gate.. 

- could participate in a national driver competition that allowed dues-paying NASCAR drivers to compete for a fairly substantial year-end points fund . However, to many competitors (and some promoters) the system was clear as mud. In order to figure the points out, one needed accurate information from all the participating tracks and access to the weighted spreadsheet. The weights assigned to finishing positions varied from week to week depending on a whole bunch of different factors such as car count, whether they had heat races or not, how many laps, type of track, what division they were in, and several other mysterious factors. To many, the system didn't seem to be transparent and it led to some bad feelings among those not seeing much of a return on their annual and weekly NASCAR fees. And several promoters i had contact with at the time felt that the deal seemed to favor certain tracks over others.  And when asked by the the drivers how the system worked, promoters were often embarrassed to admit that they had no really good idea themselves. Not good for morale 

- got a freebie from one of the NASCAR sponsors, like red paint from Winston, a scoreboard from someone, caution lights from someone, etc, but nothing from NASCAR itself. 

- received administrative support from NASCAR.  Frankly, they simply kept track of their own books to make sure all the competitors and track staff had paid for their NASCAR license and entered the racing results provided by the individual tracks into their spreadsheet to keep track of the driver points. 

- received management advice from the NASCAR professionals.  This amounted to a occasional visits by a low ranking NASCAR "official."  

- could use NASCAR to be an impartial arbitrator regarding competition decisions made by the track - like DQs, tech issues, interpersonal disputes, penalties, etc, brought by competitors. Basically, NASCAR simply asked the track manager what he/she wanted NASCAR to say and that was how things were decided.  I know this for a fact since I was directly involved in several of those disputes. 

In the end, every SAS promoter - and I've known them all personally - either declined to have the track NASCAR sanctioned at all or dropped the sanction after a few years of struggling to make it work. Perhaps a SAS promoter actually made money from the NASCAR sanction, but I don't know who that might have been.

NASCAR is a name that virtually everyone recognizes and toyotatim is correct when has says that the name itself can be leveraged into a revenue stream.  But that takes management skills not often found in the local racing community.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, top_shelf_12 said:

People go to Bowman Gray for races? If NASCAR was so great, why is SAS closed? Or Odessa in Missouri or Irwindale and IRP short track. Hell they even went dirt awhile. IRP thrived on USAC races as I remember Thursday Night Thunder fondly. I'm sure people involved with SAS will disagree with the "money was flowing" statement. 

Just for the record, Irwindale is still open and under new management until at least the end of 2019.  The outdoor all-purpose mall and entertainment complex fell through.  Last I heard the people managing it now have strong racing ties and want to buy it outright.  .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering how many tracks are still "NASCAR Home Tracks" so here is the breakdown:

86 Nascar Home Tracks Via their Nascar Home Tracks Page

26 In different countries:

Canada: 12

Mexico: 8

Europe: 6

60 in USA

6 Tracks are not really home tracks: Bristol, Dover, Iowa, New Hampshire, Sonoma, Watkins Glen which we all know do not run weekly race programs.

Nick brought up a lot of good info about the NASCAR Sanction which he has stated many times on this website as yes you get the NASCAR name its not worth all the headaches that go along with it.  Yes you get a shot at the $30,000 paycheck at the end but you have to ask :

A. Will racers run 18 to 20 weekends a year to be able to compete with the tracks on the East Coast.  These are the number of races you would have to run to break into top 10 at Division 4. When Brandon and them won the NASCAR championship they could run that many weeks a year but things have changed since then.   Most of those tracks that ran that many races were Dirt tracks there was some Asphalt tracks but that was ones that have a rich history of racing (Bowman Grey, Hickory, Madison, La Crosse, South Boston). 

B. Will the promoters even want to be NASCAR Sanctioned? You have to remember Houston was then they dropped it. 

I think we need to focus on getting the tracks built, and run with common rules of Houston, Pensacola, Mobile where racers can come in and run and not have to change everything under the sun.  That was a big problem when SAS was open under the Nascar Sanction their rules were completely different from Thunderhill, Corpus, and Houston.  During Texas Asphalt Racing hey days you have 4 asphalt tracks running and all 4 were running different rules.  Towards the end the tracks did come together and have common rules and had great purses. But you had some racers that would only run Houston and not run THR even though rules were the same.  So yes your forward thinking is good and you have a bright outlook with big money races but first lets get the tracks actually up and running.  Give them a year or two to get the kinks worked out before they start throwing these big races.  Smiley Sitton told me and a few others one time that for a racetrack to be really successful and run smooth the track needs to go through about 3 promoters before things really smooth out.  If you look back at a lot of the local tracks you will see that trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can always find a reason to have objections to something.   Hating on Nascar is counter productive to Mr Essie trying to get a track built.  He may say, screw it, too many haters..........

Mr Mandabach used the Nascar sanctioning and worked to its finest.  Huge sponsors came on board and even Championship bonuses from large Local Corp Sponsors.   There is no reason that same model would not work right here in San Antonio.  Corp sponsors are everywhere here.  Whataburger, Toyota, Valero, USAA, HEB, Frost, Chesapeake Energy, Marathon Oil, EOG Resources, etc.  Their names are all over sporting events.   Time to cheat em up and go man,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, toyotatim said:

You can always find a reason to have objections to something.   Hating on Nascar is counter productive to Mr Essie trying to get a track built.  He may say, screw it, too many haters..........

Mr Mandabach used the Nascar sanctioning and worked to its finest.  Huge sponsors came on board and even Championship bonuses from large Local Corp Sponsors.   There is no reason that same model would not work right here in San Antonio.  Corp sponsors are everywhere here.  Whataburger, Toyota, Valero, USAA, HEB, Frost, Chesapeake Energy, Marathon Oil, EOG Resources, etc.  Their names are all over sporting events.   Time to cheat em up and go man,

If any potential track owner doesn't have the whole picture - haters included - they are going in with blinders on and will face reality pretty quickly. And if a potential track owner withdraws from his/her plans simply because they will face negativity along the way, then they probably shouldn't even consider being a track owner or promoter. It comes with the territory whether anyone wants to admit it or not.  Here on LSSZ I do my best to keep the local scene free from most of the negativity, but have you been to Facebook lately? Or any number of other less-moderated racing sites where input is allowed from the public?  Even Speed51 has it's fair share of boo-birds in spite of their almost constant monitoring of their on-line products.

Secondly, I totally agree with you on Mr. Mandabach's ability to round up meaningful partnerships and sponsorships. He was the reason HMP did so very well during his management tenure there. Check out this interview I did with him a few years back. The fact is that you will note that John never mentioned NASCAR as one of the reasons why the track was successful during his time there.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

THE WORD NASCAR isnt nearly as big as it use to be ..nascar has its own problem self induced  that is . folks just dont spend much time speaking about it anymore .at work that was all the customers would talk about if I mentioned racing or they knew we were racers , .when nick was part of sas  back when it was Winston cup   nascar was very popular .heck I got people to go watch races at sas by saying Winston cup track ..my wife still has  the Winston cup jacket she received from sas track owner when nick worked there or ran it either way .. .. I dont dislike nascar it just got boring and predictable once they started car of tomorrow and gone down sense .cookie cutter tracks .shutting down short tracks that got them where they were at the time  and then started running on Saturday nights . and they look nothing like a Saturday night show anymore .. even the cars dont impress me much …..I know tim is big time nascar and  that is great .but dont tell us nascar is as great as it use to be or better ..nascar isnt any where near what it was .. and I agree with nick .if a track owner wont build a track cuz some one may not be happy .they should not build it .. a strong owner manager that knows how to  over look the negative and moves past it  . can succeed … he has to be able to promote .have a set of rules run by them .no favorite driver or team .all get treated the same ..regardless .my wife has scored  for sas tida .cc speedway .and sts .. I raced back then and she did me no favors .our son races and she does him no favors .that is how a track must be run ..no favors ..

Edited by HiTech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×